All benchmarks were performed using hyperfine with 5 runs per tool after a warm-up run.

Performance Overview

mkbrr consistently outperforms other torrent creation tools across various hardware configurations. The benchmarks show that mkbrr is not only faster but also maintains better consistency, especially on mechanical drives where other tools struggle with variance.

Hetzner AX102

2.86s for 15 GiB

Leaseweb SSD

7.24s for 21 GiB

Hetzner HDD

41.02s for 14 GiB

Apple Silicon

9.71s for 30 GiB

Detailed Results

Hardware

Hetzner Dedicated Server

  • AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
  • 128GB DDR5 RAM @ 3600 MT/s
  • 2× KIOXIA KCD8XRUG1T92 in SW RAID-0

Test Results

15 GiB 1080p season pack

  • mkbrr: 2.86s
  • torf: 3.06s
  • torrenttools: 3.11s
  • mktorrent: 16.83s

Performance Consistency

mkbrr maintains good consistency across all platforms, with variance ranging from 0.25% to 2.4%. It particularly excels on storage-heavy workloads, where other tools can show up to 39% variance.

Hetzner AX102

All tools showed good consistency on high-end hardware:

  • mktorrent: 1.62% variance
  • mkbrr: 1.75% variance
  • torf: 2.29% variance
  • torrenttools: 2.93% variance

Hetzner HDD

Other tools showed significant fluctuations on HDD:

  • mkbrr: 2.4% variance
  • torf: 9.9% variance
  • torrenttools: 22.0% variance
  • mktorrent: 39.1% variance

Leaseweb SSD

All tools performed consistently on SSD:

  • mkbrr: 0.25% variance
  • mktorrent: 0.36% variance
  • torf: 0.87% variance
  • torrenttools: 1.02% variance

Detailed Benchmark Data